Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional and endoscopic imaging in ampullary tumours: systematic review.
Br J Surg
; 111(1)2024 Jan 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38198159
2.
QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Ann Intern Med
; 174(11): 1592-1599, 2021 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698503
3.
Cost-effectiveness of preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
J Surg Res
; 193(1): 202-9, 2015 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25172090
4.
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic laparoscopy for assessing resectability in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
BMC Gastroenterol
; 15: 44, 2015 Apr 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25888495
5.
Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS One
; 17(11): e0277460, 2022.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445884
6.
Can you trust clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery.
Updates Surg
; 74(2): 391-401, 2022 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34519972
7.
Design of surgical randomized controlled trials involving multiple interventions.
J Surg Res
; 165(1): 118-27, 2011 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20097373
8.
Clinical relevance assessment of animal preclinical research (RAA) tool: development and explanation.
PeerJ
; 9: e10673, 2021.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33569250
9.
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review.
HPB (Oxford)
; 12(3): 155-65, 2010 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20590882
10.
Top research priorities in liver and gallbladder disorders in the UK.
BMJ Open
; 9(3): e025045, 2019 03 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850408
11.
Comparative safety and efficacy of vasopressors for mortality in septic shock: A network meta-analysis.
J Intensive Care Soc
; 17(2): 136-145, 2016 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28979478
12.
A network meta-analysis comparing perioperative outcomes of interventions aiming to decrease ischemia reperfusion injury during elective liver resection.
Surgery
; 159(4): 1157-69, 2016 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26606882
13.
Medical Therapies for Uterine Fibroids - A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
PLoS One
; 11(2): e0149631, 2016.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26919185
14.
WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.
World J Emerg Surg
; 11: 34, 2016.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27437029
15.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
PLoS One
; 10(3): e0121699, 2015.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25799113
16.
A Cochrane systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies aiming to decrease blood loss during liver resection.
Int J Surg
; 23(Pt A): 128-36, 2015 Nov.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26432546
17.
Impact of Preoperative Anaemia and Blood Transfusion on Postoperative Outcomes in Gynaecological Surgery.
PLoS One
; 10(7): e0130861, 2015.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26147954
18.
Ursodeoxycholic acid and primary biliary cirrhosis: EASL and AASLD guidelines.
J Hepatol
; 51(6): 1084-5; author reply 1085-6, 2009 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19864037
19.
Validity of criticism of Cochrane Review on closed-system drug-transfer devices.
Am J Health Syst Pharm
; 76(17): 1267-1269, 2019 09 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31340026
20.
Is sustained virological response a marker of treatment efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection with no response or relapse to previous antiviral intervention?
PLoS One
; 8(12): e83313, 2013.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24349487